Bhavesh Patel, via the OSLIST:
...Yes I would agree that experiencing how clean language and clean coaching works is important, and then clean space as well. It is a bit like open space, some people just don't get it until they jump in and then in makes sense in the first minutes!
The clean approach that I experienced really made sense to me because of my open space experience. Open space supports the force of self-organisation in groups, clean language supports the force of self-organisation in individuals.
Let me try to explain my understanding of it. Normal coaching approaches are quite directive, like many facilitation processes. They involve a series of steps, usually starting with goal identification, and then questions are used as a way of controlling the process and therefore the person to some extent. There are times when this is useful, and other times when it is not.
The clean approach recognises that we are deeply complex individuals with all sorts of stuff going on inside. We are influenced by so much internal and external stuff of which we are only slightly aware and out of all that comes that small part of reality that we are conscious of!!! So WHO KNOWS how it all works, we barely know ourselves... and then add to that all the cognitive science pattern detecting biases that we have.
One way to work with a complex adaptive system called a person is to use symbolic language / metaphor. Words will never describe that deep complex reality of ourselves, however metaphors probably get the closest to expressing it because they can hold so much more than explicit descriptions can. Abstraction rather than explicitness may be much more important than we presently recognise when it comes to human learning.
So the clean approach has 9 very light content free questions that provide just enough minimal structure to support a person work with their dynamic self-organising complexity through noticing their metaphorical landscape from which emerges self, meaning, and all else.
Clean does not attempt to define a goal and reach an action plan like most coaching does. It starts wherever the client wants to start, and even starts wherever the client wants to sit down, and even how they want to sit down, if they want to! Once it starts the coach simply asks the relevant question from the 9, and then sees the response and then based on that asks the next question, and the client ends up wherever they end up by the end of the session.
So if someone is wondering if you can use open space with one person in a coaching context, the clean approach gets close to it.
Sequence and Source
For more about the core Clean Language questions and how to use them, get the book here: http://judyrees.co.uk/products/clean-language-get-the-book/
Clean Language applied in coaching, meetings, invitation, planning sorts of conversations: http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/276/1/3-Simple-Steps-for-Better-Meetings/Page1.html
The Art of Clean Language, Penny Tompkins and James Lawley http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/109/1/Less-Is-More-The-Art-of-Clean-Language/Page1.html
Clean Language 5-minute coaching http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/319/1/Book-Five-Minute-Coach/Page1.html
Spatial/Temporal? Orienting with Clean Questions (diagram)
via the OSLIST:
"The technology that came to be know as 'Clean Space' evolved alongside Clean Language. Space was no longer empty area. It had properties and peculiarities of its own. Physical space became psychoactive and therapy took a new dimension." —Philip Harland, The Power of Six, p. 18.
The Power of Six, by the way, seems to be simplicity itself (the exact wording varies depending on the situation):