ConferenceComments|
Comments below From Drake Zimmerman |
|
Comments below From DrakeZimmerman |
|
|
|
|
|
A. Capacity to give B. Capacity to make things happen C. Connections they already have. |
|
:A. Capacity to give :B. Capacity to make things happen :C. Connections they already have. |
|
A. Change happens fast B. Few people make a difference C. Small inputs make THE difference. |
|
:A. Change happens fast :B. Few people make a difference :C. Small inputs make THE difference. |
|
Drake Zimmerman CFA JD P.O. Box 326 voice: +309-454-7040 Normal, IL 61761 fax: +309-454-6914 |
|
DrakeZimmerman |
...as scribbled by some of our participants, in the midst of closing reflections Sunday morning, about where we'd been and where we might go next with this work...
_______________________________________-
Comments below From DrakeZimmerman
1. Problems are of limited number in any given community.
2. What are, search for the keystone problems. Solve the few that solve the many.
3. Focus on SOLUTIONS, not problems. You get what you look for.
4. Respect the Dreamer, Realizor, Critic in each of us and in each group. Critics and Dreamers have different functions, both of which are valuable.
5. Map areas and topics by who is doing what where. Get a GIS map and identify NGO's local groups doing work in an area (note analogy to Malaria nets, water, etc.) Dan Gassill was doing GIS for Chicago.
6. Convene groups working on similar topics & stakeholders to identify and fill gaps. They probably are the mappers, anyway-
7. NETWORKS exist and overlap.
8. Overlapping NETWORKS can multiply strengths of each.
9. People from other parts of the political spectrum are closer than they appear, disagreements fade sometimes or disappear entirely when talked about in a safe environment. Some issues come into sharp relief, such as, who's responsibility is it to solve the problem.
10. Locals may have the solutions: Example: the Malaria work in Ghana was 87% planned by locals and executed by them: 95%+. Outsiders coached, gave models, provided some resources (from other outsiders) and asked questions.
On the charity side
On the donor's side
1. Most donors are under-aware of their capacity.
2. Given more efficient methods, however measured, more donors get engaged.
3. Asking up front: What's Your Passion! Is a bit direct and puts people off. A gentler elicitation works. May take more time and be more respectful.
4. Coaching is now ubiquitous, AND coaches have not yet linked cleanly with financial folks.
5. Massive training is needed
6. Donors go through stages. Donor ed would help to train them 'up' a learning curve. Few know the learning curve yet.
7. Fortunately: The tipping point tells us:
WE ARE ALL CAPABLE OF MAKING SMALL INPUTS.